On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Florent Daigniere < nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote:
> They might be pragmatic but they miss the point. We want to change the > templating > engine so that 'web-designers' can use their favourite wysiwyg editor to > help us come up with a kick-ass design. Code-maintainability and other > software-engineering concerns are only secondary here... > I don't know how many web designers you've worked with, but I've worked with a few good ones and they all work directly in css and html - none of them to my knowledge use a wysiwyg editor. The days of proficiency with DreamWeaver being a sufficient qualification to call yourself a web designer are long gone. > GWT doesn't allow that... The only wysiwyg editors I know about are within > IDEs (Eclipse and Netbeans)... That's not the tool of choice of designers. > You're still writing JAVA code as opposed to plain HTML. As far as I know, > from the list of suggested frameworks, only Wicket fulfills this > requirement. > > see: > https://wicket.apache.org/learn/examples/helloworld.html GWT is more proscriptive, which may be a good thing (why invent an entirely new HTML widget-set from scratch?), but a designer can still modify its appearance through css. Ian. -- Ian Clarke Personal blog: http://blog.locut.us/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120328/23f7be64/attachment.html>
