On Fri, 04 May 2012 09:56:48 -0400, Jakob Ovrum <jakobov...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 14:30:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I suggest:

1. Only expand tree to the level of the current symbol selected. So for instance, you click on std.datetime, you see all the top-level symbols of std.datetime *not* expanded. If you click on std.datetime.Month, the Month enum expands in the tree.

You mean like the module list currently works with packages and modules?

I don't see it working that way. If I click on etc.c.sqlite3 for example, it doesn't collapse std.

Essentially, what I mean is, I should only see the parents, immediate children, and siblings of the currently selected item in the tree *by default*, and then let the user expand if he's interested in more. I only suggest this for the module, though.

For example, std.datetime has a huge tree, but everything is expanded fully. If all the top-level items are collapsed, then I don't have to go as far to navigate for something.

2. When inside a module, only show the packages of that module as breadcrumbs, without indentation. That saves you the white space.

Packages of a module?

packages that a module is in. For example, etc.c.sqlite3 is in packages etc and c. If we make those breadcrumbs instead of part of a large tree, it can get around your worry about whitespace, because they don't need separate indentation.

2. The index.html goes to links like std_base64.html, but the actual doc is at std.base64.html, so you get a 404.

The links on the index page are generated from hard-coded HTML in index.d. With the new fix for the noscript sidebar, file names must use a dot as a package separator, while the hard-coded paths use an underscore (the package separator in output files is configurable, by the way). Previously the links incidentally worked because the output was configured with underscores.

So the problem really lies with the Phobos documentation for using hard-coded links. I think the noscript sidebar is more important than the (terribly outdated) index page, which could be fixed by editing the source anyway (I suppose I could easily do this for the Phobos bootDoc demo).

OK, not a big deal then. Part of the problem with phobos ddoc in this regard is that cross-links are defined in each individual module.

-Steve

Reply via email to