On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 20:04:50 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
I think it's good.
But personally I'd expect:
* master to be what you define as dev, because e.g. GitHub puts
master as default target branch when making pull requests.
Yeah, I know it's their quirk that it's easy to miss. Still
leaving less burden to check the branch label for both
reviewers and pull authors is a net gain.
* And what you describe as master (it's a snapshot or a
pre-release to me) to be named e.g. staging.
And we can as well drop the dead branch 'dev' then.
That sound also like a good plan to me.
