On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 20:48:30 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 20:04:50 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
I think it's good.
But personally I'd expect:
* master to be what you define as dev, because e.g. GitHub
puts master as default target branch when making pull
requests. Yeah, I know it's their quirk that it's easy to
miss. Still leaving less burden to check the branch label for
both reviewers and pull authors is a net gain.
* And what you describe as master (it's a snapshot or a
pre-release to me) to be named e.g. staging.
And we can as well drop the dead branch 'dev' then.
That sound also like a good plan to me.
Updated to follow the idea, plus added bunch of process
description. Feel free to comment in order to refine this.
http://wiki.dlang.org/Release_Process
