On Wednesday, 19 December 2012 at 19:26:48 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 December 2012 at 19:01:56 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
I was hoping for more consensus to build in this thread. Right
now it seems there's still quite a bit of controversy about
what the best way to go is.
I'm afraid a lot of discussions we see right now are plain
useless because overengineered. This shouldn't prevent us from
switching some more basics things, like the git workflow and
see how it work.
This process need some actual practical use for the reflection
to go forward, as it has gone way too far in the stratosphere.
Yes, overengineering is pointless, and doing something basic is
better than doing nothing at all, and knowing what will work and
what won't and what the challenges are means that we have to try
something out or we'll never learn anything.
There are some main points that I think everyone agrees with that
could be implemented immediately.
Do we all agree that MASTER becomes the "Dev" branch?
Do we all agree that we need a "testing" (aka staging) branch?
Do we all agree that we need a "stable" branch?
--rt
