On 12/19/12 5:07 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 December 2012 at 21:48:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter needs to chime in about that. One possibility is to continue
using tags for marking releases, and then branch for the few important
releases that we want to patch.
Note that what is described on the wiki distinguish new version (that
actually bring new stuff) and revision (that contains only bugfixes).
Does having branches that are not used anymore is a problem ? They'll
not make the repository much bigger because the data is in history anyway.
I kinda like the idea that we have tags for releases not planned for
long term support and distinguished branches for those that we do.
Clarifies intent a lot.
Andrei
