On 2013-02-09 10:57, Tove wrote:
@property int a;I would prefer if @property simply disallows '&' then it doesn't have to be lowered into anything and can stay a field... if you later decide to add a "real" getter/setter, it still would be source compatible and you wouldn't have to refactor the source.
If it's not lowered to functions they won't be virtual, which might be wanted.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
