I already thought about this too, good enough that D choose not to use final for const variables like Java does.
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 12:54 -0500, Michel Fortin wrote: > On 2013-02-09 15:22:28 +0000, Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com> said: > > > I completely agree, I really like it. Do we want to be able to use > > attributes like "final", and perhaps others, when declaring a property > > field: > > > > @property final int a; > > > > The lowered functions would have the "final" attribute attached to them > > self. > > That'd make a lot of sense. >