I have to agree on that. My first impression was that ref& is equal to c++11 &&Kind Regards Benjamin Thaut
Ok, it seems that I think differently. And what is the general opinion of '&A' instead of 'ref &A'?It has all the benefits that I described in my first post, but it may not be so confusing. If you like to ask "why not A&": That is more complex as it seems to be, a opinion which is shared by Jonathan. And I sincerely hope that no one is annoyed about my attempts to solve this problem.
