I still like the idea of '&A'.
As far as I studied the code, something like @ref isn't possible,
because ref is already a keyword. Except as Pseudo-property. But
this is a combination of '@' and 'ref' so that both, '@ref' and
'@ ref' would be valid.
- My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Zach the Mystic
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue reference... Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue refer... Minas Mina
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue r... Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rva... Minas Mina
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue r... Benjamin Thaut
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rva... Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries with... Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries ... Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries ... Zach the Mystic
- Re: My thoughts & tries ... Zach the Mystic
- Re: My thoughts & tries ... Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries ... Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries ... Dicebot
- Re: My thoughts & tries ... Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries ... Dicebot
- Re: My thoughts & tries ... Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries ... Zach the Mystic