Am 30.03.2013 12:04, schrieb Namespace:
I have to agree on that. My first impression was that ref& is equal to
c++11 &&
Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut
Ok, it seems that I think differently.
And what is the general opinion of '&A' instead of 'ref &A'?
It has all the benefits that I described in my first post, but it may
not be so confusing.
If you like to ask "why not A&": That is more complex as it seems to be,
a opinion which is shared by Jonathan.
And I sincerely hope that no one is annoyed about my attempts to solve
this problem.
No I highly appreciate it, that you are trying to solve the problem. The
current state of the language on this is annoying and it needs to be fixed.
I personally would like &A the question is if this is the "D-Way". Maybe
we should add a new keyword like "vref" for "value reference".
Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut
