On Tuesday, 2 April 2013 at 17:30:33 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
I think 'scope ref' is better.
'in' = 'const scope', then 'in ref' = 'const scope ref'.
bool opEquals(in ref T rhs) const { ... }
Kenji Hara
2013/03/30 21:06 "Namespace" <rswhi...@googlemail.com>:
As far as I studied the code, something like @ref isn't
possible, because
ref is already a keyword. Except as Pseudo-property. But this
is a
combination of '@' and 'ref' so that both, '@ref' and '@ ref'
would be
valid.
I still like the idea of '&A'.
As far as I know Jonathan was strict against it, or not?
But that sounds and looks nice and would be very easy to
implement.
