On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:05:05 -0700 "H. S. Teoh" <hst...@quickfur.ath.cx> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:01:28PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:52:33 +0200 > > "Idan Arye" <generic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > but I don't really know > > > where to put it. None of the existing modules seems fit, and I > > > don't want to open a new module(std.monad?) for a single function. > > > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > I'm not a Phobos dev, but I think std.algorithm would be the right > > place. > [...] > > Hmm. What about std.functional? It seems to fall into the category of > stuff that lets/helps you write functional-style D code. > Yea, but the same is true for a lot of std.algorithm. Besides, despite the name, std.functional appears to mostly just be the place for the tools to use the old string literal style lambdas.
