On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 02:36:51 -0400, Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com> wrote:
On 2013-06-11 02:47, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I thought that it was clear that anything being submitted for review for
inclusion in Phobos actually had to be in a state where a pull request
for
Phobos could be created for it. We certainly can't possibly vote it in
if it's
not in such a state, because we wouldn't even know what it would look
like
when it was merged in.
A quick answer:
OK, this is good, clearer.
* orange.serialization.archives.XmlArchive ->
orange.serialization.archives.xmlarchive
This should be std.serialization.archives.xmlarchive?
The rest I'm not sure about. I can put it in std.traits and other places
where I see it fit.
It would be good to know what is being merged in, and where. Or as I read
your response elsewhere, you will make them private for now, good.
I'll start with merging it with Phobos.
I will take a look at the existing API in the meantime. Knowing how it
will fit in phobos makes this easier, thanks.
-Steve
