On Wednesday, 11 December 2013 at 12:44:52 UTC, Simen Kjærås
wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP52
Abstract:
Implicit conversion to and from other types are useful, and is
to some extent covered by existing language features. Some
cases are currently not covered, but could be worthy additions
to the toolbox.
I've tried to figure out good ways to add some sorely-needed
implicit conversions to the language, but I'm sure there are
details that need to be ironed out. In other words - destroy!
--
Simen
Implicit conversion has proven to be a really bad idea in C++.
What make your solution superior to existing ones ?
