On 12/12/13 8:09 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 12/12/13 17:04, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Great. I'm all for keeping it simple :o). Can you fix Kahan's example
(or class
of examples) with a glorious hack and call it a day?
FWIW: I intend to land the Imaginary type code I've been working on, but
I'll have no problem if it gets rejected out of hand; it's been a
worthwhile learning exercise. OTOH, if I can be pointed to Kahan's
example, I can also take a look at workarounds for that instead.
A few searches returned this:
http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1992/6127.html
The PDF is a scan...
Andrei
