On 12/12/13 17:04, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Great. I'm all for keeping it simple :o). Can you fix Kahan's example (or class of examples) with a glorious hack and call it a day?
FWIW: I intend to land the Imaginary type code I've been working on, but I'll have no problem if it gets rejected out of hand; it's been a worthwhile learning exercise. OTOH, if I can be pointed to Kahan's example, I can also take a look at workarounds for that instead.
