On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:43:55 UTC, Jeremy Powers via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
From my mucking about before, I think you'll get more mileage
from using
libdparse directly than trying to (re)implement a parser for
the plugin.
For one, you save yourself all the pain of fixing weird edge
cases and
keeping up to date.
I agree, but integrating something external with IntelliJ's
platform seems like kind of a PITA. It looks like a lot of stuff
makes heavy use of PSI trees (see:
https://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/IDEADEV/Developing+Custom+Language+Plugins+for+IntelliJ+IDEA#DevelopingCustomLanguagePluginsforIntelliJIDEA-ImplementingaParserandPSI)
I'm no expert in developing IntelliJ plugins either though...
