On Thursday, 17 December 2015 at 07:51:42 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-12-17 00:43, BLM768 wrote:
One is to make as much of it as possible in plain old
static HTML. Stuff like the articles rarely changes, after all.

This is an horrible idea. No sane person would use raw HTML. The only advantage is that it's HTML so there's documentation available.

Yeah. I didn't think that one through.

The idea I had in my head was to build a template in (mostly) raw HTML, write each article as an HTML snippet, and use either a framework or a build script to paste them together, so it's not _completely_ raw, just enough so you actually see the HTML. The main thing was to move away from building all the tags with macros.

But yeah, I didn't express that clearly enough (or think through it properly).

Reply via email to