Walter Bright Wrote: > foobar wrote: > > ATM, Phobos ranks extremely poorly in this regard. Far worse than C++ which > > is by far one of worst ever. both Java and C# are surprisingly high on this > > list and are behind various "new-age" scripting languages such as python and > > Ruby and languages that were designed to be readable by humans such as > > Smalltalk. > > I think you've mixed up libraries with languages. Please rephrase so we know > what you're referring to and give specifics. >
I just tried to save typing :) Just replace above "language foo" with "language foo's standard library" Java (the language itself) is mediocre at best but the Java standard libraries are excellent with comprehensive usable documentation to boot. Phobes is half a notch above c++ stdlib which is the worst ever from a usability and readability perspective. Are we still using G-d files? really?
