On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 23:07:51 Jacob Carlborg wrote: > I think it is, don't know what others think. What it does is it catches > AssertErrors so other unit tests can continue to run and then gives a > nice report at the end.
I'm against it. I think that the compiler/runtime should be fixed so that each unit test block is run in a module even if one fails. That would solve the problem quite nicely IMHO, and that's already _supposed_ to be how it works. It just isn't properly implemented in that regard yet. And I'm against unittest blocks running any code after a single failure. So, I don't think that any additional unit testing framework is necessary. - Jonathan M Davis