On Friday, December 30, 2011 21:38:07 Jacob Carlborg wrote: > On 2011-12-30 19:49, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > On Friday, December 30, 2011 13:41:37 Tobias Pankrath wrote: > >> I really think it is and will use one for my D code. Since both worlds > >> could live together peacefully there is absolutely no reason not to > >> include one in phobos. > > > > It's one thing to use a fancier framework on your own. It's quite > > another to put it in the standard library. D's unit testing framework > > is designed to be straightforward and simple. On the whole, it does the > > job quite well. And once the issue of not running subsequent unittest > > blocks within a module after a failure in that module is fixed, I see > > no benefit from adding any additional library support. It just > > complicates things further. > > > > - Jonathan M Davis > > Will that be able to give a proper report of all failed tests in a nice > format?
I think that the AssertError's message (which includes the file and line number of the failure) and its stack trace are plenty. It's exactly what you need and nothing else. - Jonathan M Davis