On Friday, 22 June 2012 at 15:45:30 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I actually meant my previous post to be the last in this thread.
But here it goes:
Sorry :\
1. I classify the above as speculation on my part, namely to
put it in other words (not featuring any individual):
"this work take a lot of low-level hacking meaning that
investigating symbols output by compiler and their meaning is
least of problem there usually"
That's ALL I meant to say here. You can frame it like advice,
insult, promotion or whatever you fell like (it's not like I or
someone else can stop you).
The trouble is I only see what you write, not what you think.
What you're writing here is very clearly different in tone from
what you said before, even if it wasn't intentional.
(Usually the onus is more on the speaker to get his words across,
not on the reader to try and decipher them.)
2. The sarcasm is not lost on me, but for some reason I _think_
you are/were outraged way before my post.
"Outraged"? Not sure at what you're referring specifically...
Being outraged doesn't help sort out things 99% of time (this
is my assertion you may disagree).
Totally agree... though (until now) I didn't see any attempt at
"sorting out" anything. (The second comment only made things
worse.)
3. If anything the mailing list/NG is not technical support
(especially "general discussion ones") I'm not obliged to offer
you any help. It's all about sharing opinions.
Yes, and I wasn't asking for you to offer me help either.
But insulting people -- yeah, It's against my expectations to go
on an NG and be told I'm too stupid to do something. Even if it's
your opinion.
So take it or ignore it and let's move on.
Sure, if you'd like to. (I didn't get that message from you until
now.)
