The outcome of the SCAMP beta test was
1. busy detection worked much better than everyone expected for a
first iteration design
2. data transfer was insufficiently reliable under normal HF band
conditions
SCAMP used the RDFT engine for data transfer. Perhaps the SCAMP
developers will replace this engine with a more effective
implementation, but if such work is ongoing, its being conducted
quietly.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kd4e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ... Had SCAMP worked ...
> > 73, Dave, AA6YQ
>
> SCAMP "failed"? This is the first time I have read that
> statement about SCAMP.
>
> I have read over and over that SCAMP succeeded in many
> areas and was still under development.
>
> Did SCAMP truly "fail", and in what specific areas, or
> was it just not developed to full completion for some
> reason(s)?
>
> --
>
> Thanks! & 73,
> doc, KD4E
> ... somewhere in FL
> URL: bibleseven (dot) com
>
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
