I have worked Olivia on 14105-14110...also MT63, not very often, indeed.

Never checked below 14070 for digital....maybe it could be interesting.

On 40, I have found 2 watering holes: 7070-7075 and 7035-7038

I have used Olivia and Hell on 7073.

I have worked quite a few exotic DX on 7035, and would like to keep it 
that way, keeping the chatter on 7070...yesterday night there were two 
south african stations, making it a more interesting place to look around.

Jose, CO2JA

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date:  Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:59:21 -0500

>I have used Olivia, Throb, PSK63, Hell, MFSK all successfully on the low end 
>just below the normal PSK freqs on 20 meters.  It would seem to me the best 
>place on all bands, using the low end of normal PSK frqs, where people would 
>notice you.  Early on, in each of those modes, that is about the only place I 
>heard anyone, or saw any spots.
>
>Danny Douglas N7DC
>ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
>SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all
>DX 2-6 years each
>.
>QSL LOTW-buro- direct
>As courtesty I upload to eQSL but if you
>    use that - also pls upload to LOTW
>    or hard card.
>
>moderator  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>  From: Andrew J. O'Brien 
>  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
>  Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 6:38 PM
>  Subject: [digitalradio] Clarification : Establishing digital calling/beacon 
> frequencies
>
>
>  Just to clarify my original point...
>
>  I'm looking to establish a suggested calling frequency for ALL digital modes 
> except CW, PSK31, RTTY, SSTV , PACTOR , and ALE(data ALE).  
>
>  My suggestion is that members of this list utilize a common frequency to 
> call CQ and/or use attended beacon features within their digital software.  
> This would be for Olivia, Dominio EX, Throb, PSK63/125 , , MT63 ,Hell CHIP, 
> MFSK16/8, PAX/PAX2 , THROB, experimental AX25. 
>
>  The idea is simply to make it easier to find stations to work rather than 
> trawling the bands in 300-500 Hz ranges looking for  potential signals.
>
>  My experience suggest that even on good propagation days, say on 20M, the 
> amount of simultaneous QSOs in the aforementioned modes rarely exceeds 3-5 .  
> When it is at the 5 level,  it is often 2-3 Olivia stations, maybe 1 MFSK16 
> and one Hell.  I will argue that MOST of the time it is less than three 
> simultaneous QSOs . Sometimes NO signals at all.
>
>  Thus, the amount of interest in the "exotic digital modes " is at such a 
> level that we would benefit from clustering, and our use of a calling/beacon 
> frequency would not likely clutter up the portion of the band.
>
>  If we established 4 beacon frequencies  (80,40,30, and 20M) you could easily 
> monitor  the bands via scan features in  the radio .  
>
>  Again, the idea would be just to "meet" on the calling frequency and move 
> further up/down the band for extended conversation.  I am NOT suggesting a 
> different calling frequency for each mode. 
>
>  20 M seems like the easies band to establish a data frequency that allows 
> worldwide participation.  The others are more complex due to varying regional 
> bandplans.  I  will read the feedback I have received so far and suggest some 
> frequencies to try this weekend.
>
 

 
______________ ______________ ______________ ______________
Correo enviado por ElectroMAIL. Facultad El�ctrica. CUJAE Dominio: 
electrica.cujae.edu.cu


 
                   

Reply via email to