Hi Tony Have you done a path simulations test of the FEC version of the MFTTY mode?
73 de LA5VNA Steinar Tony wrote: > > All, > > It's good to see the enthusiasm about MFTTY. It has a nifty GUI and > its easy to use. A few have mentioned a lack of lack of sensitivity > and that does seem to be the case. But I think it's safe to say that > we don't always need to bring an elephant gun to a turkey shoot ; ). > > For what it's worth, and with all due respect to the author, I've > tested MFTTY with an HF path simulator and it is less sensitive and > less robust than say PSK31. On air tests seem to show that the mode > performs well with low power under quiet conditions. > > Many thanks to Norbert and those like him who give us the opportunity > to experiment and play with new modes. If it wasn't for them, we'd > still be lugging those heavy RTTY machines into the shack ; ). > > Tony -K2MO > > _
