WELL SAID
73 de
Ron W4LDE
On 3/3/2010 10:36 AM, pd4u_dares wrote:
... considering legal action ... has an apparent plan ... may have
understandably frustrated Jose
-----------
So as far as I understand it the developer with a Spanish temperament
is understandably frustrated by actions of some people making baseless
fuss. Baseless since the FCC position is actually opposed to the
claims that were made that created the fuzz.
It is conclcuded hat Jose's behaviour is not in line with the spirit
of ham radio. I ask myself if banning someone's software from amateur
radio use, is in line with the ham radio spirit. I think it isn't
either. So I think this advice on a public group to ban the use of
ROS, is of the same order. And thus I can't understand why even more
fuzz is created by banning ROS.
Why not apologize for the unnecessary fuzz created around ROS while
there was no definitive position from the FCC. I think Jose will then
apologize for his "apparent plans". Then all the fuzz is over.
I hope this fuzz is showing us that we all have far to big ego's, and
a lack of patience, understanding and compassion for others. And are
apparently merely judging others' behavior in the context of the "Ham
Radio Spirit" but do not scrutinize our own "no support" threats along
the same line. This is hypocrite I think.
So let's forget all the fuzz, and continue beta testing further in the
name of the "HAM Radio Spirit" I would say.
