Where does one file comments on this proposal?
I sure wish the WinLink guys would backfit the WinMor busy frequency detector
and deploy it to every PMBO. I'd much rather write code than letters to the
FCC...
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien <k3uka...@...> wrote:
>
> FYI, I plan to file a comment opposing the PIII on 60M proposal. My
> objections are
>
> PIII is a proprietary mode .
> PIII as used in non-busy detect Winkink system has been the leading cause
> of QRM complaints for the past 10 years, hence they are likely to cause the
> same for the primary services that have 60M allocations.
> Recent tests of NBEMS with FLICS and WRAP have proven as effective as PIII
> and take up less spectrum (and are not proprietary)
> Winmor 500 offers most of the Winlink capabilities without the problems
> associated with wide PIII and is freely available to all hams.
>
> I will probably suggest that they authorize PS31, MFSK16 and Winmor 500 if
> they are going to get mode specific.
>
> Andy K3UK
>
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Dave Wright <hfradio...@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On May 10, 2010, at 7:26 PM, Chris Jewell wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Rick Ellison writes:
> > "recommending that instead of authorizing only PSK-31 and Pactor-III,
> > that the FCC instead permit all publicly-documented data modes "
> >
> >
> > So, has Pactor III every been publicly-documented???
> >
> >
> >
> > Dave
> > K3DCW
> >
> > Real radio bounces off the sky
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
