spread-spectrum > is mot legal on HF in the USA That is the problem .''in the usa''.. some Clark in a office messed things up good style .. for him she or it , SS = big bandwidth , so shove it over 220 meg .
Problem is , other popular modes use similar systems , didn't chirp get taken down as well .?.. Collateral damage or un intended consequence Why doesn't some one or one's follow the legal process and ask for all narrow band SS modes in normal ssb channel be allowed for use in the usa ..other wise , the usa is no longer leading the world , just leading itself up the garden path If somebody of note doesn't take the matter in hand, the remaining SS based modes are in danger of joining the blanket ban, only take some one to ask why I can use this but not that .. and `this' will join the banned list. as the song say's http://www.kididdles.com/lyrics/t050.html G . --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Alan Beagley <ajbeag...@...> wrote: > > On 07/15/10 01:54 pm, "John Becker, WØJAB" wrote: > > > I wonder where ROS would be today if someone had been > > truthful about it the first place? > > > > That little game of banning some from using it (for unknown reasons) > > was just about it for me. > > I received a few ROS transmissions within a week or two of the mode's > appearance but have taken little interest since. I no longer have the > software on my computer. > > It seems to me that the developer of the mode may have cooked his own > goose: he declared it to be a spread-spectrum mode, and spread-spectrum > is mot legal on HF in the USA. > > 73 > > Alan NV8A >
