On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:16 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-04, Graham Lauder <yori...@openoffice.org> wrote: > > > Document Foundation is obviously cast in stone because that is a legal > > entity > > but the product name should be up for discussion right now when it's most > > sensible. > > Being pedantic here, according to Sophie in a note on a thread titled > '[Legalese] "Foundation" or "Group"?' on Oct 1, the Document Foundation > is not in fact a legal entity yet. (I was surprised to read this.)
+1 > > > Currently it's a group and the Foundation is not up yet, we will set > > it up with the community members who wish to contribute to it. We are > > planing to write a charter, organization, governance, duties, etc... > > not only the small group who has launched the project, but all of the > > people who are willing to be part of the Foundation. > > [...] > > For the moment, the German association is helping us to structure the > > whole thing and have a legal backup, but we still have a lot of work > > to move to an official foundation. > > --Jean > > > > > -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
