Agree. Java affect key components, not only extensions: base needs java, and as consequence the bibliographic database too.
2010/11/2 T. J. Brumfield <enderand...@gmail.com>: > I'm an user, and not a developer. So perhaps this is a silly question. > > >From a user's perspective, it always seemed like the Java portions of OOo > were shoehorned in. Starting a JVM eats up unneccessary memory and takes > time. One of the most common complaints of OOo is that it is a bloated app > that is slow and takes up too many resources. > > I assumed that Sun kept the Java portions of OOo in since they liked to push > Java. In the age of netbooks, tablets and mobile computing, trimming the fat > becomes more important. > > Would it be possible to remove the Java portions of LibreOffice and > reimplement them without the need to fire up a JVM? > > Is there a technical advantage of running the wizards and such in Java that > I'm not aware of? > > Thanks! > > -- T. J. Brumfield > "I'm questioning my education > Rewind and what does it show? > Could be, the truth it becomes you > I'm a seed, wondering why it grows" > -- Pearl Jam, Education > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html > Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived *** > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
