Hi Josh -- Thanks for sharing the video, I also found it to be really interesting.
>From a "future" interaction point of view, I find this concept very short sighted. Not only is does the concept not demonstrate more social interaction (as you have mentioned), but the interaction is still focused on a single tangible object. Can we not imagine a world were we might not have to carry around objects (even cool bendy ones), but rather seamlessly be able to accomplish our tasks through the embedding of nanotechnology in our surrounding environment? Isn't one of the goals of good interaction design to be so transparent that there is basically no interface. I see this is a definite possibility with nanotechonology. -- http://allaland.wordpress.com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=26576 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
