Don't know why, but Bruce Esrig wrote a reply that isn't showing up.
Bruce wrote:

"This answer is for the question posed at the beginning of the
thread:
how can I help my organization define these terms?

The top priority is to be able to convey meaning. That's why
defining
the scope is so effective. A good definition will connect each term
with one or more sets of specific items (responsibilities, behaviors,
goals) that it may cover in particular contexts according to
particular speakers. The recognized bundles of meaning can then be
recognized as possible scopes. Once the scopes are defined, someone
in
the organization has to issue a ruling stating which terms stand for
each scope.

It's a brave try to make "user experience" stand for the entire
experience of users and to make "customer experience" stand for the
entire set of positions held by people who actually buy the product.
It's a linguistic grand unification: notice how you can take the
words
in the noun phrase, read them, interpret them, and tell the story of
how your interpretation is driven by the component words. It's just
great. It makes it easy to talk and be understood.

But user "user experience" isn't just a noun phrase standing
around
asking to be assigned its natural meaning. It's a marketing term for
one or more designers carrying out one or more design disciplines.
Even though many leading interaction designers  have adopted it with
delight and defined it as an umbrella term, the community that traces
its lineage via usability also has its natural definition of what the
term should mean, a definition that homes in on usability issues,
which then can also be defined broadly or narrowly. Now I am noticing
for the first time a third community, of IxDA list members for whom
user experience has taken on the meaning that user interface design
might have had before. That's natural if your perception of
interaction design is formed from the most common application area
where interaction design is known to happen: in digital user
interfaces.

So the meaning that you choose for the term may depend in part on
what
community you are trying to assert you belong to, or perhaps the
opposite: you might choose a meaning based on the community you
belong
to. But you're better off choosing a meaning based on the community
you need to talk with.

If you're being asked to define it, and if you're really lucky, you
can do water-cooler ethnography. It sounds as though your
organization
has already determined how to assign responsibilities to groups. If
not, that's the first step. Then, you can ask what terms the people
you work with assign to each of these sets of responsibilities,
especially the people whose usage is likely to influence the way the
organization talks about it. Make sure the key influencers either
adopt the usage you want or tell you the usage that you're going to
use, so that the terminology becomes stable inside your organization.
That way, they'll know what to say when they want to fund the
activity.

If you already knew this, then the discussion should confirm your
suspicions. Adopting terminology is a social process, and much though
"the community" would like to answer your question, the
participants
on this list don't form a single unanimous community, and there are
multiple definitions to point to. It's those definitions that you
need
to discuss internally and assign names to. If the right people are
comfortable with the terms, everyone else will take their cue from
them, or else the exercise, ending without consensus, will enable
little subgroups of individuals to wink at each other, knowing that
they share an interpretation.

The key is to enable everyone to understand one another, whether or
not they can all bring themselves to use the same language.

Best wishes,

Bruce"



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=49125


________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to