On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, Joseph Kern wrote:

And Sales does have an ethical enforcement consideration; the Better
Business Bureau. Which is a non-profit like LOPSA. ;-)

however the rules that they are investigating and enforcign are not ones they make up, but instead general fraud and fair dealign laws.

The BBB also cannot prevent anyone from selling and has no requirements for even knowing that someone is selling stuff.

But I agree that it would be a better model than Lawyers, Doctors, or Engineers.

David Lang

On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Joseph Kern <[email protected]>
wrote:

Well, there is a lot of argument that in the medical field, the system
keeps out good doctors as much as it creates them. Talk to people who learn
medicine outside the US and then move here where their qualifications are
not recognized.

Yes. And? There are a lot of people that go overseas for medical treatment
because it's cheaper and just as good. Free markets at work!

If we change our subject to Lawyers: every single one of them need to pass
the bar exam in every state they wish to practice. What affect does locking
out capable lawyers "because they don't test well" have on the state bar
association? Minimal I think as most people want a Lawyer that can "test
well". ;-)

I think you have as much of a chance to enforce "Ethics and Standards"
in Ssytem Administration as you do in Sales.

I think we are talking about the same things here David. I am not arguing
for or against "Professionalization". But to say that there is no chance in
hell of creating a standard of fundamental instruction or ethical practice
goes back to my original comment, "Man, if you have to ask what jazz is,
you'll never know." If we go down this road, we can quickly say that
"System Administration cannot be taught, System Administrators can only be
born", which is a false statement, and more than a little self-aggrandizing.
:D

Of course System Administration can be taught! Of course there is an
implied ethical constraint in designing an organizations information
infrastructure! Have we found the fundamental principles that bind these
things together yet? No. I don't think many people have actually looked.

Where is our Little Schemer[1] for System Administration? This is what I
mean when I say fundamentals; teaching System Administration from first
principles. A verifiable (internally consistent), fundamental (from first
principles), education (free or paid for), and from this logical approach
an ethical system should arise naturally within the constraints of the
system.

[1]:
http://kysmykseka.net/koti/wizardry/Programming/Lisp/Scheme/The%20Little%20Schemer%204th%20Ed.pdf

On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 7:13 AM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, Joseph Kern wrote:

 Outside of the DoD, Information Security is in no better condition than

System Administration.

Give it a minute. All the big commercial players that want DoD contracts
must hire certified people now. General Dynamics, Northrup, Lockheed,
etc.


well, most of those companies have to hire people with Top Secret
Clearence, that doesn't mean that such clearances are ever going to be
common outside that niche.

 how can you impose any verifiable educational requiements when so many in

the field are completely self-taught? and how would you punish people for
violating ethics without the ability to prevent people from working in
the
field?.

Well you can't punish anyone without laws right? That's the lives
Professionals live. Doctors, Lawyers, Engineers, CPAs, etc. They have a
structure of laws and ethical practices that dictate their good standing
in
their chosen profession both ethically and legally.


the barriers to entry are MUCH lower in IT, and getting lower all the
time. All those fields that you talk about either have aspects that make it
fairly easy to control them. Courts are small and so they can control who
accesses them. Engineers must be stisfactory to the government building
comissions. I'm not sure that CPA really counts because you can do a lot of
work in the accounting field without being a CPA

Linux started with a student working on his own computer, and while most
Linux developers now are being paid for their work, most of them started
working on it as a hobby.

Running even massive systems is now within the reach of hobbiests thanks
to Amazon AWS and similar. But let's ignore cloud providers for now.

Remember that a lot of ISPs started from someone's garage, brining in
lots of phone lines and banks of modems. A similar investment today (in the
right location) would get someone a gigabit Internet connection and more
compute capability than all but the biggest companies had available to them
during the .com days.

Adn over time, the processing power and connectivity available to the
individual is only going to improve. Trying to make laws saying that these
individuals are not able to use these resources unless they are certified.

Add to this the International nature of the Internet, and the idea of
controlling who can manage systems becoems even more outlandish.

 I view any call for rules that would have prevented me from entering the

field with deep suspicion.

Bingo David. Which is why I am not sure that "Professionalization" is
really the road forward.


So what is the road forward?

 I ran out of money for college back in '94 when I was takinga  CS/Math

couble major. Deom there, I have no verifiable education (mostly
self-taught, conference training, a smidge of vendor training) and am in
the security sub-field of ssytem administration.

Verifiable only in the context of teaching. Not in charging actual money.
It's a high ideal, and reality will probably fall short, but it's worthy
of
effort.


I'm not sure what you mean, most of my learning was not doen via methods
where money changed hands.

 This is why I think that looking at the automotive field is a much better

fit for comparison to system administration than the others that have
been
mentioned. It's the one other field that I can think of that allows
completely self-taught people to work alongside of formally trained
people.

For sure. We need to preserve that aspect of this field.

 So I think trying to impose rules that would eliminate the vast majority

of people from the field is a waste of time.

Has it been a waste of time for Doctors, Lawyers, Engineers, etc? School
costs (the business side of education) certainly haven't dampened the
number of students seeking the education. Do you think the quality of
Doctors has risen since formal education and internship programs were
instituted?


Well, there is a lot of argument that in the medical field, the system
keeps out good doctors as much as it creates them. Talk to people who learn
medicine outside the US and then move here where their qualifications are
not recognized.

I am in no way opposed to providing and encouraging education. I just
don't want to have anyone start blessing specific training or schools as
the only way to be educated.

I think you have as much of a chance to enforce "Ethics and Standards" in
Ssytem Administration as you do in Sales.

David Lang




--
Joseph A Kern
[email protected]





_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to