dip;472388 Wrote: > > My point was that almost all my squeezboxes are arranged that I either > cannot access them directly because they are e.g. positioned on top of a > cupboard (and I am not carrying a ladder with me all the time) or that > they are at least several meters away from my normal listening position > so that I use the huge font 90% of the time. Both facts make the Touch > useless for me since the squeezboxes are too far away to be touched and > the width of the display of the Touch is smaller than that of the > Classic.
The width of the Touch display is smaller, but the overall display is more than twice as large as the Classic. It's more readable than I think you expect it to be. I wrote more on this topic a while back: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?p=458577#post458577 That said, the new SqueezePlay displays do make me think of this headline from The Onion: http://www.theonion.com/content/news/report_90_of_waking_hours_spent ;-) -- peterw http://www.tux.org/~peterw/ free plugins: http://www.tux.org/~peterw/#slim AllQuiet BlankSaver ContextMenu FuzzyTime KidsPlay KitchenTimer PlayLog PowerCenter/BottleRocket SaverSwitcher SettingsManager SleepFade StatusFirst SyncOptions VolumeLock ------------------------------------------------------------------------ peterw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2107 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69660 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
