It's open, at least for a few more minutes, but with a new number:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61683
However, we will have to circumvent the behavioral problems exhibited by
developer pjanik in order to at least discuss the bug.
54703 is a query about the nature of the eggs.
61667 is a request to disble or remove them.
Those are two very different things.
The presence of the easter eggs, as cool as they are in pre-release
versions, renders the product unsuitable for use in certain environments
unless there is a way to disable to eggs. Requiring and end-user or even
a sysadmin to fork off a branch of the source code, find the
offending bits, remove the offending bits, re-compile the whole,
re-package the binary is not a reasonable nor realistic option. There
needs to be a way to disable them or else just drop them.
-Lars
Lars Nooden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Software patents endanger the legal certainty of software.
Keep them out of the EU by writing your MEP, keep the market open.
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Sigrid Kronenberger wrote:
Hi Lars,
Lars D. Noodén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
I expect, that you're not successful with your bugreport. :(
I've included some of your comments in the bug report:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61667
You can vote for it here:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/showvotes.cgi?voteon=61667
Your issue is already closed and marked as an duplicate of this issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
But this issue is already closed. :( So it looks, like you and Ian (and
all the others) aren't really successful with your bugreport.
Sigrid
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
