|
Am 14.02.2016 um 21:45 schrieb John
Crisp:
Hmmm .... that is the part that turned me off, the fighting about the framework. Assuming the functional spec and a high level design of the server manager are agreed to and signed off, do you really care which framework is being used? As a developer I would preferrably use something I already know to make maximum use of my time instead of being forced to use something I've got no experience with. This is the 'atractive' part I was referring to in my last posting, tell the developer what you need and leave the implementation details to him/her.The biggest issues currently are Moving to CentOS 7 New server-manager framework Move to gitEach of those have sub tasks and pros and cons. Do we build a new server manager just on CentOS 7 ? Do we build it on CentOS 6, and then migrate it all to CentOS 7 ? Which framework do we use ? Etc etc etc. I am sure there is plenty more that I have missed but hope that answers a little and gives a little insight. If you have more questions or ideas then PLEASE fire away.... B. Rgds John _______________________________________________ Discussion about project organisation and overall direction To unsubscribe, e-mail discussion-unsubscr...@lists.contribs.org Searchable archive at https://lists.contribs.org/mailman/public/discussion/ |
_______________________________________________ Discussion about project organisation and overall direction To unsubscribe, e-mail discussion-unsubscr...@lists.contribs.org Searchable archive at https://lists.contribs.org/mailman/public/discussion/
