John Merrells wrote:
>
> On 20-Jan-06, at 10:08 PM, Johannes Ernst wrote:
>
>> - but you also say that we should just be codifying existing practice
>> ... which existing practice are you referring to?
>
> As I wrote in draft #0: 'For example: SXIP, LID, OpenID, and Passel.'
and you left out SAML, Liberty, and WS-Federation, at least.
>> As far as I know, the only technology that makes some of the
>> technologies you listed interoperate so far (and only partially,
>> because SXIP is not involved) is YADIS... I have the proof right here
>> on my machine that it works beautifully between LID and OpenID
>> implementations of at least four different vendors already ... so I'm
>> a little unclear what exactly are you proposing?
>
> I don't think that we need a protocol to interoperate with other protocols.
>
> I think we need one protocol.
You're dreaming. Those horses are out of the barn and off in the next state.
Thus, seems to me that the YADIS work (http://yadis.org/) is more relevant and
interesting than this here attempt to get an IETF rubber-stamp for sxip.
JeffH
_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
