> Thus, seems to me that the YADIS work (http://yadis.org/) is more relevant
> and interesting than this here attempt to get an IETF rubber-stamp for
> sxip.

Although John has put out a SXIP-like DIX draft, there is no reason for
anyone to accept it at face-value. At this point the only thing of value is
the purpose and reasoning set forward in the charter document.

>> I don't think that we need a protocol to interoperate with other
>> protocols. I think we need one protocol.
>
> You're dreaming. Those horses are out of the barn and off in the next
> state.

IMO, the horses are a bunch of disconnected islands spread across the
internet. It sure would be nice to have a single system that wasn't
controlled by one company to connect the islands.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Hodges
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 3:57 PM
To: Digital Identity Exchange
Subject: Re: [dix] To add to the charter

John Merrells wrote:
 >
 > On 20-Jan-06, at 10:08 PM, Johannes Ernst wrote:
 >
 >>  - but you also say that we should just be codifying existing practice
 >> ... which existing practice are you referring to?
 >
 > As I wrote in draft #0: 'For example: SXIP, LID, OpenID, and Passel.'

and you left out SAML, Liberty, and WS-Federation, at least.


 >> As far as I know, the only technology that makes some of the
 >> technologies you listed interoperate so far (and only partially,
 >> because SXIP is not involved) is YADIS... I have the proof right here
 >> on my machine that it works beautifully between LID and OpenID
 >> implementations of at least four different vendors already ... so I'm
 >> a little unclear what exactly are you proposing?
 >
 > I don't think that we need a protocol to interoperate with other
protocols.
 >
 > I think we need one protocol.

You're dreaming. Those horses are out of the barn and off in the next state.

Thus, seems to me that the YADIS work (http://yadis.org/) is more relevant
and 
interesting than this here attempt to get an IETF rubber-stamp for sxip.

JeffH



_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix



_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix

Reply via email to