> Without a consensus-supported basis, the WG will wander endlessly in the > fields of requirement documents.
I agree and I should have said "proposed" charter document; as that is what needs to be scrutinized and refined before tackling other issues. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt D. Zeilenga Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 4:59 PM To: Digital Identity Exchange Cc: 'Digital Identity Exchange' Subject: RE: [dix] To add to the charter At 04:43 PM 1/24/2006, Suresh Venkatraman wrote: >At this point the only thing of value is >the purpose and reasoning set forward in the charter document. I would like to see the charter specifically refer to a set of individual submissions as serving as the "basis" for the working group's deliverables (one existing I-D per deliverable document). This not only shows we have enough folks to produce our deliverables, but (at least rough) consensus going in. Without a consensus-supported basis, the WG will wander endlessly in the the fields of requirement documents. Kurt _______________________________________________ dix mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix _______________________________________________ dix mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
