On 11/9/05, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/9/05, hugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would say: release a 0.9 version now (or in the near future) and give > > a clear roadmap (that's what the trac feature is for ;-) ) of what will > > go into 1.0 before release. That way people have some "quite stable > > but not 1.0" tarball to play with, with a defined > > compatibility-breakage ahead, but one they are warned about. That would > > give us a bit more time to do the 1.0 right. > > This sounds great to me. Thoughts, Jacob and everybody else?
This sounds something like what Robert originally suggested, with the version number changed. Which is to say, +1. :)
