On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:21:06PM +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > The number 4 wasn't actually the important bit - it was that I want > to see a range of noSQL approaches represented. I don't want to see > 4 key-value stores; I want to see a key-value store, and a document > store, and a column store, etc. I need to see that the API is rich > enough to cover all noSQL bases. >
I've seen references to Django's test suite on this list in the past, and I'm curious why the criteria can't simple be: "a clean run on our test suite." I have a backend [1] for MonetDB (a column store DB). They expose a SQL wrapper around their non-SQL engine, which makes it pretty easy to support. On my todo list was to see how it fares with the Django test-suite. I guess the test suite must not cover all the basees, making it a necessary but not sufficient criteria for inclusion? Correct? Thanks, m [1] http://github.com/mbucc/monetdb-python -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
