On 17 fév, 17:29, Emily Rodgers <emily.kate.rodg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> As I said, we aren't doing his coding for him, And as I said, this is _not_ the problem. I don't mind providing working code as an answer, and did it on quite a few occasions during the past 10 years or so, on various newsgroups and mailing lists. But crystal-ball coding is just a waste of everyone's time - 8 times out 10 (at least), the answer is just plain wrong, the OP wastes time trying to use it, then comes back complaining it "doesn't work", etc, etc... Been here, done that, bought the T-shirt, ok ?-) And yes, it's the OP's duty to provide at least the minimum context if he hopes to get useful help. So asking the OP to provide this context is not "dismissive", it's the required condition for us to have a chance to effectively help. (snip remaining - and somewhat patronizing - comment). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
