Rolf E. Sonneveld writes: > started, titled 'Indirect mail flows'. In my view both John and Henrik > tried to make (a start of) an inventory of all sorts of real-life > situations that potentially can break DKIM signatures or more in > general: cause DMARC failures for legitimate mail flows where sending > DMARC policy is p=reject.
IMO, the place to record the inventory is the wiki. Mailing lists are not a good place to keep such records. > And before starting the discussion about possible solutions it may be > better to first 'complete' [1] this inventory. The suggested solutions, if they can be implemented without standardizing additional protocols, are useful fodder for the proposed BCP, which I think is on-topic at the moment. I suppose they might also be added to the wiki on a separate page or as footnotes, or something. So the discussions are useful IMO. I hope Somebody[tm] is adding such ideas to the wiki. One of these days[tm] I'll do a run through the list archives for that purpose, but I don't claim a patent on that idea! Steve _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
