On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:58 PM, J. Gomez <jgo...@seryrich.com> wrote:
> No. It is "unreliable" for Receivers to apply it. Sure, for the Sender > p=reject is perfectly reliable, if he happens to have all his ducks neatly > in a row. But the Receiver cannot know if the Sender has all his ducks > neatly in a row when said Sender publishes p=reject. Question that the > Receiver asks to himself: Is the Sender aware of p=reject drawbacks and can > therefore the Receiver rely on the Sender's declared p=reject? Answer to > that question: The Receiver has no way to know, therefore p=reject is > unreliable from the point of view of the Receiver, irrespective of what the > Receiver ultimately decides to do with the Sender's declared p=reject. > I think you're actually saying exactly what I thought you meant. Thanks for confirming. I just wanted to be clear for context. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
