----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <step...@xemacs.org> > To: "Kurt Andersen" <ku...@drkurt.com> > Cc: dmarc@ietf.org, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superu...@gmail.com>, "Franck > Martin" <fra...@peachymango.org> > Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2015 9:56:44 AM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] OpenDKIM ADSP, DMARC and ATPS support > > Kurt Andersen writes: > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Franck Martin <fra...@peachymango.org> > > wrote: > > > > my corporate email address, but I wanted to mention the presence of such > > > headers is not foolproof. > > > With List-Id becoming a more generic feedback channel, I suspect > > that its value for indicating the participation of a MLM will > > further degrade. > > Guys, if you want to attack a proposal, please make one first. I did > not propose this. My whole point was that it's easy to imagine ways > that the registration problem could be handled by "p=reject" domains > *if* they want to handle it, and therefore we *don't* need to make any > such proposal ourselves. No more, and no less -- I wouldn't waste the > list's time on such a proposal if I were you. But YMMV, be my guest.
I did not want to burn your proposal, sorry if it passed like this. I just wanted to make a comment, from personal observations, that non-mailing list related emails have list-id too. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
