On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:23 AM Seth Blank <s...@valimail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 8:57 AM, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > >> Simple administrative approach: >> >> Stall ARC for a few more months until we can get ed25519 into the >> libraries, then adjust the document to make it MUST verify both. >> > > Is there any appetite in the group to handle rotation in a separate > document? > I would have preferred not to defer it when arc was on standards track, but now that it's experimental, I could see deferring it. I'm also fine with John's approach to wait for dcrup, though I don't know many folks are waiting for arc to be released as an rfc before working on it, I would think openarc going 1.0 is probably the main thing folks were waiting for. Brandon
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
