Hi, Le 21/06/2020 à 21:44, Douglas E. Foster a écrit : > > There is no legal corollary for "largely-unmodified". [...]
Then what? An overwhelming majority of users need e-mail for day-to-day communication, not for binding legal contracts. "Largely-unmodified" as mailing-lists have been doing it for 40 years is good enough (we usually don't hear authors complaining that they were impersonated). People who need a high-integrity validation for each and every message before reading it are the minority. The rest of us would rather keep our communication possibilities unimpaired, even if it means dealing with a bit of spam and use cryptography or out-of-band checks for important business. Not to say that DMARC's validation is not valuable per se. But asking mailing-list (or other) users to jump through hoops to simply communicate as they have for 40 years is incredibly arrogant. Cheers, Baptiste P.S.: and no, "then don't use DMARC" cannot be the answer. Some time down the road, it will be forced on us by the large mailhosts, who have a business interest in curbing spam. So it'd better be done right. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
