In article <cabugu1qxssaourfs78rcyg8sskhhaihbqvpcndbhxs1fbe3...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:36 AM Seth Blank <seth= >40valimail....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> We have a session on the books for IETF108, and would like suggestions >> from the group for the agenda, otherwise the chairs will choose relevant >> topics. Items in tickets or from the past month are all fair game. >> > >Based on the recent discussions that have been happening, I think that >there are two key topics that should be hashed out in the F2F: > > 1. Jim Fenton's ask to develop a threat model; along with this I think > we need to more tightly defined the problem statement > 2. Is the goal of this WG to "get DMARC onto the standard track" or is > it to "solve the spam problem"?
I would hope that we'd all agree that the answer to the second question is obvious. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
