On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 2:58 PM Jesse Thompson <jesse.thompson= 40wisc....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> On 11/12/20 3:23 PM, John Levine wrote: > > You now can put a DMARC > > record on a name below the org domain to shadow a subtree, but I don't > > think that is a problem that needs to be solved. > > I'm confused by this statement. Are you saying that you can "now" do > subtree shadowing with sp? as in the following language is being changed > "now"? > I think that John was referring the potential future state where tree-walks were being done, but even then I don't think it would work quite that easily. A record at "a.b.example" would not shadow "x.y.a.b.example" if "x" or "y" chose to express some policy. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
